Fast Company magazine is running an online promotion that has some media folks buzzing. It's an experiment in viral social media marketing called The Influence Project.
I learned about it from Joan Stewart in her excellent Publicity Hound newsletter. I respect Joan and I like reading Fast Company magazine, so I signed up.
The Project is billed as an effort to identify the most influential person online but I just thought of it as fun, a marketing gimmick, not a serious test to discover who the true online "Influencers" among us are. (Heck, I know I have very little influence and had no intention of promoting my project link far and wide to up my score. Plus getting people you know to simply click a link to, in essence, "vote" for you is more about popularity than influence, anyway.)
Some took a more critical view. Follow these links to sample some of the reaction here and here.
These writers and others make valid points, but in the end, I bet it will be "all good" for Fast Company. From a publicity point of view, the controversy got more people talking. And while the backlash may have been an unintended consequence, the additional digital "ink" increased their name awareness and will probably sell more magazines. Now that's influence.**
**Defined as the power to affect persons or events.









Recent Comments